You know I dreamed about you
I missed you for 29 years







Wicked: The untold story of the witches of Oz.


   YES      GOOD      fuck this musical is so great      musical: wicked   

  9,235 notes10 Feb 14   

didyoudrinkmygingerale:

I don’t write “sentences.” I write lots and lots of clauses and I coordinate and subordinate them, and when I can’t do that syntactically, I like to use lots of different punctuation—like this (sometimes like this)—to express intonational contours; that is to say, my ideas TRANSCEND YOUR ORTHOGRAPHIC HEGEMONY.


The first episode of Doctor Who aired at 5:16 PM on November 23, 1963.


   YES      GOOD      JESUS CHRIST      I LOVED IT SO FUCKING MUCH OKAY      fuck      i will never be over this      dw spoilers      tv: doctor who   

  74,418 notes24 Nov 13   

If it’s a problem when Moffat (and team) is writing it, then how come it was okay when RTD (and team) did it? 

grringirl:

sparklyfaerie:

I think a lot of the problems that the Doctor Who fandom has centres around the fact that, for the most part, we are divided into the Russel T. Davies and Steven Moffat camps, in terms of which Head Writer’s era we prefer. Now, I’m not saying that everyone who hates Moffat adores RTD, but for the most part, that is what I’ve noticed.

In this post, I’ll be looking at some of the common arguments I’ve found for bashing Moffat’s era and telling you exactly how they are wrong, fuck you, and how most of them can also be applied to RTD’s era (if you look). It’s time for Moffat-haters/RTD-worshippers to take off the Rose-coloured glasses (pun intended) and acknowledge that the arguments you’re making against Moffat were occurring long before he stepped up to the plate and took on the HW-ship.

Read More

image


On the Cyclical Nature of Doctor Who, or How Y’all Need to Stop Worrying and Love the Show 

thefourteenthdoctor:

levi3o4:

*spoiler-free*

Oh, fandom. It’s at times like this that I consider starting a Doctor Who fan blog.

The spoiler-tastic events of the last couple of days have made a minor furor, haven’t they? For those of you who don’t know, a rumor just came out about the 50th-anniversary episode of Doctor Who that, if true, is going to leave many fans shocked, confused, and angry. Or it might, anyway - you never know with these things.

Already, we’re hearing the standard cries to boycott the show and have the creators hanged, burned, and fired, in that order.

The only reasonable response to these demands? Sit your ass back DOWN, fandom. You have almost no power and even less perspective. Because the show will survive without you quite well - it always has and it always will. How, you ask? Simple. You’re fanning it wrong.

There are two ways to look at Doctor Who - either as an extremely long-running, ever-evolving piece of storytelling and production craft, OR - as a sequence of five-or-six-year shows that follow one after another, Star Trek style, of which we happen to be witnessing only the latest iteration. The best part? Both interpretations are absolutely valid. They’re both great ways of looking at this varied, multifaceted show. And, similarly, you can be one of two different kinds of fan: either you can love the show as you would a family member - one whom you’ve known for years, whom you have seen grown and change, whom you’ve laughed at and screamed at and just generally adored, even when they frustrate the ever-living shit out of you - or you can love the show as you would a short-term romantic partner - passionately at first , then settling in with their flaws and their quirks, and then, one day, realizing that they’re just not the person you fell in love with, and it’s time to move on.

And that’s OK. Both types of fandom are OK. In the world of Doctor Who, they’re natural and healthy. But here’s the rub: you have to know what sort of fan you are. Because if you’re a short-term lover who thinks they’re ready to go steady, you’ve got another think coming.

Did you know that Doctor Who has been:

  • an experimental, semi-educational sci-fi show? (6 years, Doctors 1 and 2)
  • an earthbound James Bond-like action series? (5 years, 3rd Doctor)
  • a Gothic Horror anthology? (3 years, 4th Doctor)
  • a quirky, Douglas Adamsesque comedy in space? (3 years, 4th Doctor, admittedly limited success, though City of Death is a tour de force)
  • an attempt at a serious science fiction program? (5 years, Doctors 4, 5 and 6)
  • a floundering mess, trying to find its feet after near cancellation and a horrifically reduced episode count? (2 years, Doctors 6 and 7)
  • a subversive fantasy with political undertones and a long term mystery? (2 years, 7th Doctor, cancelled the year before the intended payoff)
  • SEVERAL long-term series of novels? (14 years, 8 Doctors, three or more publishing houses)
  • an American movie of the week? (8th Doctor)
  • a quirky, character driven drama? (5 years, Doctors 9 and 10)
  • a Tim Burtonesque adventure serial with an attitude towards plot twists and revelations that fits in perfectly in a post-J.K.Rowling, post LOST entertainment landscape? (4th year running, 11th Doctor)

This show has been all of these things and, arguably, more. Every single one of those eras is celebrated by someone and lambasted to this day by somebody else. So tell me, please, WHICH creator “ruined the show forever”?

None of them. They’ve all contributed to a communally-told fiction in the best way they could. In so doing, they have each garnered the show new fans and pissed off old ones. In fact, THAT is the Circle of Life for the Doctor Who fandom:

Start watching the show. Fall in love with the show. Continue watching when a new era begins. Witness change. Realize, this is no longer my Doctor Who. Watch as new fans fall in love with the show. Realize, and that’s as it should be. Watch your kids getting into the show, 10, 15, 20 years later. Grumble about how things were better in your day. And fall in love all over again.

If you don’t want to do that, that’s fine. Russel T Davies gave you a great TV show that lasted five years, 60 episodes. And it ended on January 1st, 2010. You can move along now.

The rest of us? We’ll just sit back and enjoy the show.


   YES      YAY      Y A Y      FOR FUCKING SERIOUS THOUGH      god i love this show      and the person who wrote this      tv: doctor who   

  353 notes25 May 13   

Goodbye, The Office. You will be missed.


   YES      YES IT IS      THIS IS THE WORST      FUCK      tv: the office   

  6,553 notes16 May 13   

redemancy:

thatonelifechanginggirl:

tardiswanted:

saphire-dance:

I Reblogged That For You: A Story of Internet Friendship

Why the Fuck Did You Reblog That From Someone Else: A Story of pain and betrayal

You Liked My Post, But Did Not Reblog It: A Story of Mixed Signals and Confusion

#Why Didn’t You Reblog That With My Tags: A Story of Self-Doubt


   yes      queue   

  160,698 notes03 May 13   

"Take criticism seriously, but not personally. If there is truth or merit in the criticism, try to learn from it. Otherwise, let it roll right off you."

Hillary Rodham Clinton (from Living History)


  15,043 notes02 May 13   
Don't Swallow the Cap
The National

Don’t Swallow The Cap - The National


   queue      yes      good      music: the national      audio   

  947 notes28 Apr 13   

raggedyhobbit:

samandriel:

confusedtree:

10followedfelagund:

The Lord of the Rings Meme | ten scenes (2/10)

Farewell to Lórien.

This is my favorite fucking scene. 

If you’ve read the Silmarillion, you know who Fëanor was. If you don’t, Fëanor was the dickhead who created the Silmarils: three indescribably beautiful and magical jewels that contained the light and essence of the world before it became flawed. They were the catalyst for basically every important thing that happened in the First Age of Middle Earth.

It is thought that the inspiration for the Silmarils came to Fëanor from the sight of Galadriel’s shining, silver-gold hair.

He begged her three times for single strand of her beautiful hair. And every time, Galadriel refused him. Even when she was young, Galadriel’s ability to see into other’s hearts was very strong, and she knew that Fëanor was filled with nothing but fire and greed.

Fast forward to the end of the Third Age.

Gimli, visiting Lorien, is also struck by Galadriel’s beauty. During the scene where she’s passing out her parting gifts to the Fellowship, Galadriel stops empty-handed in front of Gimli, because she doesn’t know what to offer a Dwarf. Gimli tells her: no gold, no treasure… just a single strand of hair to remember her beauty by.

She gives him three. Three.

And this is why Gimli gets to be an Elf Friend, people. Because Galadriel looks at him and thinks he deserves what she refused the greatest Elf who ever lived—- and then twice that. And because he has no idea of the significance of what she’s just given him, but he’s going to treasure it the rest of his life anyway.

Just look at that smile on Legolas’s face in the last panel. He gets it. He knows the backstory. And I’m pretty sure this is the moment he reconsiders whether Elves and Dwarves can’t be friends after all.

Everyone look at this great fucking post

There are posts and then there are posts

image


   queue      YES      Y E S      THIS IS SUPER GREAT      I LOVE IT SO MUCH      book: lord of the rings      movie: lord of the rings   

  122,591 notes27 Apr 13   

brilliantfantasticgeronimo:

sansasnark:

one day I will love a female character who is consistently treated well by the writers and the fandom

one day


   YES      BLESS THIS SHOW      tv: elementary   

  3,315 notes26 Apr 13   

   YES      GOOD      I LOVE YOU      tv: castle      queue   

  2,273 notes26 Apr 13